| Title |
Geography and Poverty Traps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Economic Growth, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026294316581 |
| Authors |
David E. Bloom, David Canning, Jaypee Sevilla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 47 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,834,538
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Growth
#128
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,982
of 143,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Growth
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them