| Title |
On the re-inforcement of thermoplastics by imperfectly aligned discontinuous fibres
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, November 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00550698 |
| Authors |
W. H. Bowyer, M. G. Bader |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 41 | 41% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 19% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,185,319
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#911
of 4,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#801
of 3,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them