↓ Skip to main content

Fairness in Bargaining

Overview of attention for article published in Social Justice Research, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Fairness in Bargaining
Published in
Social Justice Research, September 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1025936712704
Authors

Madan M. Pillutla, J. Keith Murnighan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 5%
United States 2 3%
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 55 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 15%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2005.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Social Justice Research
#120
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,839
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Justice Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.