↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Therapy for Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiology Reports, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Stem Cell Therapy for Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11886-013-0369-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah M. Selem, Sunjay Kaushal, Joshua M. Hare

Abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy is a serious and life-threatening disorder in children. It is the most common form of pediatric cardiomyopathy. Therapy for this condition has varied little over the last several decades and mortality continues to be high. Currently, children with dilated cardiomyopathy are treated with pharmacological agents and mechanical support, but most require heart transplantation and survival rates are not optimal. The lack of common treatment guidelines and inadequate survival rates after transplantation necessitates more therapeutic clinical trials. Stem cell and cell-based therapies offer an innovative approach to restore cardiac structure and function towards normal, possibly reducing the need for aggressive therapies and cardiac transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells and cardiac stem cells may be the most promising cell types for treating children with dilated cardiomyopathy. The medical community must begin a systematic investigation of the benefits of current and novel treatments such as stem cell therapies for treating pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Chemistry 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiology Reports
#605
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,766
of 193,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiology Reports
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.