| Title |
Organisms or biological individuals? Combining physiological and evolutionary individuality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10539-016-9551-1 |
| Authors |
Thomas Pradeu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 24% |
| Germany | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,684,085
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#143
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,760
of 420,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.