| Title |
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 |
| Authors |
John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli, Sarah A Green, Mark Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs, Andrew Skuce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 548 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 189 | 6% |
| Australia | 150 | 4% |
| Canada | 137 | 4% |
| Germany | 127 | 4% |
| Spain | 79 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 78 | 2% |
| Italy | 34 | 1% |
| Brazil | 25 | <1% |
| Other | 353 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1670 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2975 | 88% |
| Scientists | 285 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 91 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | <1% |
| Unknown | 10 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | <1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1602 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 311 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 284 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 265 | 16% |
| Researcher | 212 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 77 | 5% |
| Other | 224 | 13% |
| Unknown | 289 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 234 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 172 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 10% |
| Engineering | 125 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 109 | 7% |
| Other | 490 | 29% |
| Unknown | 364 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5307. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#749
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2
of 6,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 208,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.