↓ Skip to main content

Regulation, recession, and bank lending behavior: The 1990 credit crunch

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Financial Services Research, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 168)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Regulation, recession, and bank lending behavior: The 1990 credit crunch
Published in
Journal of Financial Services Research, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01051961
Authors

Ronald E. Shrieves, Drew Dahl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Lecturer 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 16%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Financial Services Research
#45
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,502
of 24,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Financial Services Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them