↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the bank regulator's closure option: A two-step logit regression approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Financial Services Research, May 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 168)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Modeling the bank regulator's closure option: A two-step logit regression approach
Published in
Journal of Financial Services Research, May 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01046114
Authors

James B. Thomson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 45%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 41%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2000.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Financial Services Research
#45
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,569
of 19,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Financial Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them