↓ Skip to main content

The uses, local perceptions and ecological status of 16 woody species of Gadumire Sub-county, Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
The uses, local perceptions and ecological status of 16 woody species of Gadumire Sub-county, Uganda
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10531-006-9097-7
Authors

John R. S. Tabuti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 98 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 41%
Environmental Science 33 30%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,678
of 69,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.