| Title |
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10640-005-6028-0 |
| Authors |
Jacinto Braga, Chris Starmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 33 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#549
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,213
of 59,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.