You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
IDEAS (Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share): A Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the Development of More Effective Digital Interventions to Change Health Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.5927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Ann Mummah, Thomas N Robinson, Abby C King, Christopher D Gardner, Stephen Sutton |
| Abstract |
Developing effective digital interventions to change health behavior has been a challenging goal for academics and industry players alike. Guiding intervention design using the best combination of approaches available is necessary if effective technologies are to be developed. Behavioral theory, design thinking, user-centered design, rigorous evaluation, and dissemination each have widely acknowledged merits in their application to digital health interventions. This paper introduces IDEAS, a step-by-step process for integrating these approaches to guide the development and evaluation of more effective digital interventions. IDEAS is comprised of 10 phases (empathize, specify, ground, ideate, prototype, gather, build, pilot, evaluate, and share), grouped into 4 overarching stages: Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share (IDEAS). Each of these phases is described and a summary of theory-based behavioral strategies that may inform intervention design is provided. The IDEAS framework strives to provide sufficient detail without being overly prescriptive so that it may be useful and readily applied by both investigators and industry partners in the development of their own mHealth, eHealth, and other digital health behavior change interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 24% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 530 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 15% |
| Researcher | 71 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 114 | 21% |
| Unknown | 127 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 11% |
| Psychology | 56 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 48 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 21% |
| Unknown | 170 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,465,742
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,117
of 7,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,119
of 421,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#20
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.