↓ Skip to main content

Choice and success of job search methods

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Choice and success of job search methods
Published in
Empirical Economics, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00181-007-0148-z
Authors

Andrea Weber, Helmut Mahringer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 18 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 39 37%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 19%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Psychology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#229
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,594
of 68,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.