↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12178-008-9027-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob W. Brubacher, Seth D. Dodds

Abstract

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are a common pediatric elbow injury that are historically associated with morbidity due to malunion, neurovascular complications, and compartment syndrome. True anteroposterior and lateral radiographs are essential not only for an accurate diagnosis, but also for creating a treatment plan for these injuries. A staging system (based on the lateral radiograph) for classifying the severity of the fracture helps guide definitive management. Nondisplaced fractures are treated initially with a posterior splint, followed by a long-arm casting. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is the preferred treatment for displaced or unstable fractures. If there is any question about fracture stability, patients should be seen within 5 days postoperatively for repeat radiographs to ensure that the reduction and pin fixation has been maintained. Understanding the anatomy, radiographic findings, management options, and complications associated with this fracture allow physicians to limit the morbidity associated with this relatively common pediatric injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 13 10%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#204
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,574
of 89,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.