You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide, high-content siRNA screening identifies the Alzheimer’s genetic risk factor FERMT2 as a major modulator of APP metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-016-1652-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Chapuis, Amandine Flaig, Benjamin Grenier-Boley, Fanny Eysert, Virginie Pottiez, Gaspard Deloison, Alexandre Vandeputte, Anne-Marie Ayral, Tiago Mendes, Shruti Desai, Alison M. Goate, John S. K. Kauwe, Florence Leroux, Adrien Herledan, Florie Demiautte, Charlotte Bauer, Fréderic Checler, Ronald C. Petersen, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Lennart Minthon, Vivianna M. Van Deerlin, Virginia Man-Yee Lee, Leslie M. Shaw, John Q. Trojanowski, Marilyn Albert, Abhay Moghekar, Richard O’Brien, Elaine R. Peskind, Nicolas Malmanche, Gerard D. Schellenberg, Pierre Dourlen, Ok-Ryul Song, Carlos Cruchaga, Philippe Amouyel, Benoit Deprez, Priscille Brodin, Jean-Charles Lambert, ADGC, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 24 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,601,653
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#637
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,855
of 425,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.