You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nurses' preferred end‐of‐life treatment choices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Nursing Review, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/inr.12024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Coffey, G. McCarthy, E. Weathers, M.I. Friedman, K. Gallo, M. Ehrenfeld, M. Itzhaki, S. Chan, W.H.C. Li, P. Poletti, R. Zanotti, D.W. Molloy, C. McGlade, J.J. Fitzpatrick |
| Abstract |
Previous research has focused on physician's perspectives of end-of-life (EOL) decision making as well as patient and family EOL decision making. There is a lack of research pertaining to the EOL treatment preferences of nurses and especially nurses working in a variety of care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 50% |
| Grenada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 23% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,777,968
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from International Nursing Review
#22
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,274
of 203,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Nursing Review
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them