↓ Skip to main content

Does the Rapid Appearance of Life on Earth Suggest that Life Is Common in the Universe?

Overview of attention for article published in Astrobiology, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the Rapid Appearance of Life on Earth Suggest that Life Is Common in the Universe?
Published in
Astrobiology, August 2002
DOI 10.1089/153110702762027871
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles H. Lineweaver, Tamara M. Davis

Abstract

It is sometimes assumed that the rapidity of biogenesis on Earth suggests that life is common in the Universe. Here we critically examine the assumptions inherent in this if-life-evolved-rapidly-life-must-be-common argument. We use the observational constraints on the rapidity of biogenesis on Earth to infer the probability of biogenesis on terrestrial planets with the same unknown probability of biogenesis as the Earth. We find that on such planets, older than approximately 1 Gyr, the probability of biogenesis is > 13% at the 95% confidence level. This quantifies an important term in the Drake Equation but does not necessarily mean that life is common in the Universe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Professor 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 25 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 14%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,271,999
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Astrobiology
#270
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,040
of 48,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrobiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them