| Title |
Evidence-informed recommendations for constructing and disseminating messages supplementing the new Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy E Latimer-Cheung, Ryan E Rhodes, Michelle E Kho, Jennifer R Tomasone, Heather L Gainforth, Kristina Kowalski, Gabriella Nasuti, Marie-Josée Perrier, Mary Duggan, The Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines Messaging Recommendation Workgroup |
| Abstract |
Few validated guidelines exist for developing messages in health promotion practice. In clinical practice, the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument is the international gold standard for guideline assessment, development, and reporting. In a case study format, this paper describes the application of the AGREE II principles to guide the development of health promotion guidelines for constructing messages to supplement the new Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines (CPAG) released in 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,036,992
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,091
of 14,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,789
of 192,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#185
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.