You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneous rupture in the great Cascadia earthquake of 1700 inferred from coastal subsidence estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jgrb.50101 |
| Authors |
Pei‐Ling Wang, Simon E. Engelhart, Kelin Wang, Andrea D. Hawkes, Benjamin P. Horton, Alan R. Nelson, Robert C. Witter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 34% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 74 | 76% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,805,364
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#265
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,791
of 207,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.