| Title |
Trust and Deception in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Social Learning Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2983-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiying Yang, Yuan Tian, Jing Fang, Haoyang Lu, Kunlin Wei, Li Yi |
| Abstract |
Previous research has demonstrated abnormal trust and deception behaviors in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), and we aimed to examine whether these abnormalities were primarily due to their specific deficits in social learning. We tested 42 high-functioning children with ASD and 38 age- and ability-matched typically developing (TD) children in trust and deception tasks and a novel condition with reduced social components. Results indicated that while TD children improved their performance with more social components, children with ASD lacked this additional performance gain, though they performed similarly as TD children in the condition with reduced social components. Our findings highlight that deficits of ASD in trust and deception are primarily associated with failure of use of social cues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,425,138
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,348
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,210
of 426,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#41
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.