↓ Skip to main content

miR-146a and miR-150 promote the differentiation of CD133+ cells into T-lymphoid lineage

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
miR-146a and miR-150 promote the differentiation of CD133+ cells into T-lymphoid lineage
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11033-013-2567-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parviz Fallah, Ehsan Arefian, Mahmood Naderi, Seyed Hamid Aghaee-Bakhtiari, Amir Atashi, Katayoun Ahmadi, Abbas Shafiee, Masoud Soleimani

Abstract

MicroRNAs control the genes involved in hematopoietic stem cell (HSCs) survival, proliferation and differentiation. The over-expression of miR-146 and miR-150 has been reported during differentiation of HSCs into T-lymphoid lineage. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the effect of their over-expression on CD133+ cells differentiation to T cells. miR-146a and miR-150 were separately and jointly transduced to human cord blood derived CD133+ cells (>97% purity). We used qRT-PCR to assess the expression of CD2, CD3ε, CD4, CD8, CD25, T cell receptor alpha (TCR-α) and Ikaros genes in differentiated cells 4 and 8 days after transduction of the miRNAs. Following the over-expression of miR-146a, significant up-regulation of CD2, CD4, CD25 and Ikaros genes were observed (P<0.01). On the other hand, over-expression of miR-150 caused an increase in the expression of Ikaros, CD4, CD25 and TCR-α. To evaluate the combinatorial effect of miR-146a and miR-150, transduction of both miRNAs was concurrently performed which led to increase in the expression of Ikaros, CD4 and CD3 genes. In conclusion, it seems that the effect of miR-150 and miR-146a on the promotion of T cell differentiation is time-dependant. Moreover, miRNAs could be used either as substitutes or complements of the conventional differentiation protocols for higher efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,889,994
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#878
of 2,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,265
of 194,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.