↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for the emergency management of complications associated with the new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for the emergency management of complications associated with the new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00392-013-0560-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Steiner, M. Böhm, M. Dichgans, H.-C. Diener, C. Ell, M. Endres, C. Epple, M. Grond, U. Laufs, G. Nickenig, H. Riess, J. Röther, P. D. Schellinger, M. Spannagl, R. Veltkamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 44 27%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,216,896
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#168
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,976
of 208,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.