| Title |
Understanding gaps in research networks: using “spatial reasoning” as a window into the importance of networked educational research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational Studies in Mathematics, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10649-016-9743-2 |
| Authors |
Catherine D. Bruce, Brent Davis, Nathalie Sinclair, Lynn McGarvey, David Hallowell, Michelle Drefs, Krista Francis, Zachary Hawes, Joan Moss, Joanne Mulligan, Yukari Okamoto, Walter Whiteley, Geoff Woolcott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Russia | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 62% |
| Scientists | 30 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 32% |
| Mathematics | 17 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#735,119
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#6
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,962
of 422,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them