| Title |
Time Availability and Preference for e-Health Communication Channels for Nutrition and Physical Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Education, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13187-013-0477-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Quintiliani, Jessica A. Whiteley, Elizabeth J. Johnson, K. Viswanath |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between time availability and preference for computer-based (e-health) communication channels when receiving nutrition and physical activity information, two key behaviors related to cancer prevention. Students from a large, diverse, urban university (n = 397) completed a web-based survey indicating their usage patterns and preferences for multiple eHealth channels. Bivariate analyses were performed based on a measure of time availability, comprised of working status (25 h/week or more, 1-24 h/week, or not working) and enrollment status (full-time or part-time). Most e-health channels were broadly used by students and did not differ according to time availability. Those with the most amount of time available preferred receiving nutrition and physical activity information via social networking more frequently compared to those with the least amount of time available (60 versus 43%, P ≤ 0.05). Our study suggests that time availability may be another important factor to consider when planning cancer prevention programs. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#1,006
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,703
of 193,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.