↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary Findings of a Telehealth Approach to Parent Training in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Preliminary Findings of a Telehealth Approach to Parent Training in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1841-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurie A. Vismara, Carolyn McCormick, Gregory S. Young, Anna Nadhan, Katerina Monlux

Abstract

Telehealth or online communication technologies may lessen the gap between intervention requirements for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and the available resources to provide these services. This study used a video conferencing and self-guided website to provide parent training in the homes of children with ASD. The first eight families to complete the 12-week online intervention and three-month follow up period served as pilot data. Parents' intervention skills and engagement with the website, as well as children's verbal language and joint attention skills were assessed. Preliminary research suggests telehealth may support parental learning and improve child behaviors for some families. This initial assessment of new technologies for making parent training resources available to families with ASD merits further, in-depth study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 413 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 13%
Researcher 38 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 114 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 28%
Social Sciences 44 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Neuroscience 10 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 131 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,859,543
of 24,294,745 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,559
of 5,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,712
of 199,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#21
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.