↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The PANcreatic Disease ReseArch (PANDoRA) consortium: Ten years’ experience of association studies to understand the genetic architecture of pancreatic cancer
Published in
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, May 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Campa, Manuel Gentiluomo, Angelika Stein, Mateus Nóbrega Aoki, Martin Oliverius, Ludmila Vodičková, Krzysztof Jamroziak, George Theodoropoulos, Claudio Pasquali, William Greenhalf, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Faik Uzunoglu, Raffaele Pezzilli, Claudio Luchini, Marta Puzzono, Martin Loos, Matteo Giaccherini, Verena Katzke, Andrea Mambrini, Edita Kiudeliene, Kauffmann Emanuele Federico, Julia Johansen, Tamás Hussein, Beatrice Mohelnikova-Duchonova, Casper H J van Eijck, Hermann Brenner, Riccardo Farinella, Juan Sainz Pérez, Martin Lovecek, Markus W Büchler, Viktor Hlavac, Jakob R Izbicki, Thilo Hackert, Roger Chammas, Alessandro Zerbi, Rita Lawlor, Alessio Felici, Mara Götz, Gabriele Capurso, Laura Ginocchi, Maria Gazouli, Juozas Kupcinskas, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Pavel Vodicka, Stefania Moz, John P Neoptolemos, Lumir Kunovsky, Stig E Bojesen, Silvia Carrara, Domenica Gioffreda, Egidijus Morkunas, Olga Abian, Stefania Bunduc, Daniela Basso, Ugo Boggi, Barbara Wlodarczyk, Andrea Szentesi, Giuseppe Vanella, Inna Chen, Maarten F Bijlsma, Vytautas Kiudelis, Stefano Landi, Ben Schöttker, Chiara Corradi, Nathalia Giese, Rudolf Kaaks, Giulia Peduzzi, Péter Hegyi, Luca Morelli, Niccolò Furbetta, Pavel Soucek, Anna Latiano, Renata Talar-Wojnarowska, Sidsel C Lindgaard, Frederike Dijk, Anna Caterina Milanetto, Francesca Tavano, Klara Cervena, Bálint Erőss, Sabrina G Testoni, Judith H E Verhagen-Oldenampsen, Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko, Eithne Costello, Roberto Salvia, Evaristo Maiello, Stefano Ermini, Cosimo Sperti, Bernd Holleczek, Francesco Perri, Jurgita Skieceviciene, Livia Archibugi, Maurizio Lucchesi, Cosmeri Rizzato, Federico Canzian

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,828,530
of 28,379,583 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#281
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,527
of 418,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,379,583 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.