↓ Skip to main content

Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4075-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Pandit, F. Mancuso, C. Jenkins, W. F. M. Jackson, A. J. Price, C. A. F. Dodd, D. W. Murray

Abstract

Lateral progression of arthritis following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), although infrequent, is still the most common reason for revision surgery. Treatment options normally include conversion to total knee arthroplasty. An alternative strategy for some patients may be addition of a lateral UKA. We report the first results of staged bi-compartmental UKA (Bi-UKA) strategy. We retrospectively selected from our UKA database patients who underwent a lateral UKA to treat a symptomatic lateral osteoarthritis progression after a medial UKA. The analysis included a clinical and radiological assessment of each patient. Twenty-five patients for a total of 27 knees of staged Bi-UKA were carried out in a single centre. The mean time interval between primary medial UKA and the subsequent lateral UKA was 8.1 years (SD ± 4.6 years). The mean age at the time of the Bi-UKA was 77.1 years (SD ± 6.5 years). The median hospital stay was 3 (range 2-9 days) days, and the mean follow-up after Bi-UKA was 4 years (SD ± 1.9 years). The functional scores showed a significant improvement as compared to the pre-operative status (paired t test, p = 0.003). There were no radiological evidences of failure. None of the patients needed blood transfusion, and there was no significant complications related to the surgical procedure without further surgeries or revisions at final follow-up. These results suggest that addition of a lateral UKA for arthritis progression following medial UKA is a good option in appropriately selected patients. Observational study without controls, Level IV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 49%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,397,195
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,407
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,130
of 300,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.