↓ Skip to main content

Activity profiles of the Australian female netball team players during international competition: Implications for training practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activity profiles of the Australian female netball team players during international competition: Implications for training practice
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, May 2013
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2013.792943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Fox, Michael Spittle, Leonie Otago, Natalie Saunders

Abstract

In elite sport, to remain competitive at the international level, it is critical to understand the game demands on players to ensure sport specific training programmes are designed for optimal athlete preparation and conditioning. In netball, recent research examining the activity patterns of players at the elite level is lacking, with only one study undertaken on this level of competition in the past 30 years. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide coaches with up to date knowledge of player activity patterns as a basis for the design of optimal sport specific training programmes. The Australian female netball team were analysed using video footage of three international test matches. Player activity was categorised into five movement and eight game-based activities; and further classified as work or rest. Results suggest that differences in the current game exist when compared to the previous analysis. Positional differences were also found with regard to player activity confirming the need for an individualised component of training based on player position.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 29%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 80 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,379,073
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#1,877
of 4,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,179
of 207,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.