↓ Skip to main content

Nutrigenomics research: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science and Technology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
Title
Nutrigenomics research: a review
Published in
Journal of Food Science and Technology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13197-012-0775-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. S. Neeha, Priyamvadah Kinth

Abstract

The excitement about nutrigenomics comes from a growing awareness of the potential for modifications of food or diet to support health and reduce the risk of diet-related diseases. It is an emerging field that tends to unfold the role of nutrition on gene expression which brings together the science of bioinformatics, nutrition, molecular biology, genomics, epidemiology, and molecular medicine. The present review focuses on nutrigenomics research and to find out India's status with respect to other countries. It covers the general overview of nutrigenomics, its associated diseases, and the role of SNP in gene alteration, diet supplementation and public awareness. It is understood that with the increasing changes in the food habits and life styles, people are becoming more prone to diet related disorders. Therefore there is an urgent need to boost more research in this field to help people in understanding the relationship between diet and health, and to ensure that everyone benefits from the genomic revolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 418 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 19%
Student > Bachelor 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 10%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 111 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 8%
Chemistry 13 3%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 127 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#923,908
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#52
of 1,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,697
of 178,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.