↓ Skip to main content

LC-QTOF/MS metabolomic profiles in human plasma after a 5-week high dietary fiber intake

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
LC-QTOF/MS metabolomic profiles in human plasma after a 5-week high dietary fiber intake
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-6874-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Johansson-Persson, Thaer Barri, Matilda Ulmius, Gunilla Önning, Lars Ove Dragsted

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the alterations of plasma metabolome profiles to identify exposure and effect markers of dietary fiber intake. Subjects (n = 25) aged 58.6 (1.1) years (mean and SD) with a body mass index of 26.6 (0.5) kg/m(2) were given a high fiber (HF) and a low fiber (LF) diet, in a 5-week randomized controlled crossover intervention. The HF diet consisted of oat bran, rye bran, and sugar beet fiber incorporated into test food products, whereas the LF diet was made of equivalent food products to the HF diet, but without adding fibers. Blood plasma samples were collected at the start and end of each intervention period and analyzed by LC-QTOF/MS. In total, 6 features in positive mode and 14 features in negative mode were significantly different between the HF and the LF diet (p < 0.01, q < 0.05). Two markers, 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 2-aminophenol sulfate, were increased after HF diet, along with a tentatively identified saponin derived from oat avenacosides. The untargeted metabolomics approach enabled the identification of two new markers of dietary fiber intake in human plasma. Further studies will be needed to verify if these markers could serve as compliance markers of fiber intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Chemistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,669
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,110
of 210,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#42
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.