↓ Skip to main content

Changing Community Readiness to Prevent the Abuse of Inhalants and Other Harmful Legal Products in Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Changing Community Readiness to Prevent the Abuse of Inhalants and Other Harmful Legal Products in Alaska
Published in
Journal of Community Health, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10900-008-9087-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen A. Ogilvie, Roland S. Moore, Diane C. Ogilvie, Knowlton W. Johnson, David A. Collins, Stephen R. Shamblen

Abstract

This paper presents results from an application of the Community Readiness Model (CRM) as part of a multi-stage community mobilization strategy to engage community leaders, retailers, parents, and school personnel in preventing youth use of inhalants and other harmful legal products in rural Alaska. The CRM is designed to assess readiness to address a single social problem, based on a limited set of key informant interviews. In this study, researchers conducted 32 baseline and 34 post-intervention community readiness assessment interviews in four rural Alaskan communities. These interviews with key informants from the communities were coded and analyzed using CRM methods to yield readiness scores for each community. The aggregate results were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and the individual community scores were analyzed in the context of the overall study. Significant positive changes in community readiness were found across six readiness dimensions as well as for the overall readiness score. Variation in the degree of changes in readiness across the four communities is attributed to differences in the intervention's implementation. The implications of these results include the potential for CRM assessments to serve as an integral component of a community mobilization strategy and also to offer meaningful feedback to communities participating in prevention research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 26%
Psychology 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#1,096
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,643
of 81,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.