| Title |
Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15–24 in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-484 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Gobin, Neville Verlander, Carla Maurici, Angie Bone, Anthony Nardone |
| Abstract |
A national multimedia campaign was launched in January 2010, to increase the proportion of young people tested for chlamydia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the campaign on the coverage and positivity within the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NSCP) in England. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,052,146
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,291
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,625
of 198,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.