↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Lysyl Oxidase-like 2 in the Odontogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Molecules & Cells, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Lysyl Oxidase-like 2 in the Odontogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells
Published in
Molecules & Cells, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10059-013-0080-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joo-Hyun Kim, Eun-Hyang Lee, Hye-jeong Park, Eui-Kyun Park, Tae-Geon Kwon, Hong-In Shin, Je-Yoel Cho

Abstract

Adult human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) are a unique population of precursor cells those are isolated from postnatal dental pulp and have the ability to differentiate into a variety of cell types utilized for the formation of a reparative dentin-like complex. Using LC-MS/MS proteomics approaches, we identified the proteins secreted from the differentiating hDPSCs in mineralization media. Lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) was identified as a protein that was down-regulated in the hDPSCs that differentiate into odontoblast-like cells. The role of LOXL2 has not been studied in dental pulp stem cells. LOXL2 mRNA levels were reduced in differentiating hDPSCs, whereas the levels of other LOX family members including LOX, LOXL1, LOXL3, and LOXL4, are increased. The protein expression and secretion levels of LOXL2 were also decreased during odontogenic differentiation. Recombinant LOXL2 protein treatment to hDPSCs resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the early differentiation and the mineralization accompanying with the lower levels of odontogenic markers such as DSPP, DMP-1 and ALP. These results suggest that LOXL2 has a negative effect on the differentiation of hDPSCs and blocking LOXL2 can promote the hDPSC differentiation to odontoblasts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Design 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Molecules & Cells
#556
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,167
of 206,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules & Cells
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.