| Title |
Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, July 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02862335 |
| Authors |
Lytton J. Musselman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#4,616,488
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#141
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,565
of 21,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them