↓ Skip to main content

Telescoping in dating naturally occurring events

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Telescoping in dating naturally occurring events
Published in
Memory & Cognition, January 2013
DOI 10.3758/bf03214227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles P. Thompson, John J. Skowronski, D. John Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Professor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 38%
Engineering 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,631,411
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#244
of 1,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,305
of 282,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.