↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Autism Prevalence: Diagnostic Substitution Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Trends in Autism Prevalence: Diagnostic Substitution Revisited
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0478-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Coo, Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz, Jennifer E. V. Lloyd, Liza Kasmara, Jeanette J. A. Holden, M. E. Suzanne Lewis

Abstract

There has been little evidence to support the hypothesis that diagnostic substitution may contribute to increases in the administrative prevalence of autism. We examined trends in assignment of special education codes to British Columbia (BC) school children who had an autism code in at least 1 year between 1996 and 2004, inclusive. The proportion of children with an autism code increased from 12.3/10,000 in 1996 to 43.1/10,000 in 2004; 51.9% of this increase was attributable to children switching from another special education classification to autism (16.0/10,000). Taking into account the reverse situation (children with an autism code switching to another special education category (5.9/10.000)), diagnostic substitution accounted for at least one-third of the increase in autism prevalence over the study period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,101,174
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#389
of 5,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,076
of 89,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.