↓ Skip to main content

On the relationship between individual and population health

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 623)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
On the relationship between individual and population health
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11019-008-9173-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Onyebuchi A. Arah

Abstract

The relationship between individual and population health is partially built on the broad dichotomization of medicine into clinical medicine and public health. Potential drawbacks of current views include seeing both individual and population health as absolute and independent concepts. I will argue that the relationship between individual and population health is largely relative and dynamic. Their interrelated dynamism derives from a causally defined life course perspective on health determination starting from an individual's conception through growth, development and participation in the collective till death, all seen within the context of an adaptive society. Indeed, it will become clear that neither individual nor population health is identifiable or even definable without informative contextualization within the other. For instance, a person's health cannot be seen in isolation but must be placed in the rich contextual web such as the socioeconomic circumstances and other health determinants of where they were conceived, born, bred, and how they shaped and were shaped by their environment and communities, especially given the prevailing population health exposures over their lifetime. We cannot discuss the "what" and "how much" of individual and population health until we know the cumulative trajectories of both, using appropriate causal language.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 226 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 56 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 27%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Psychology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 63 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,005,561
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#25
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,400
of 184,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them