↓ Skip to main content

A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited), January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
Published in
Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited), January 2004
DOI 10.1520/jfs2001252
Pubmed ID
Authors

RF Kouble, GT Craig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Chemistry 3 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,556,131
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#1,002
of 3,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,580
of 143,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.