Title |
Validity of the Children’s Social Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ) in Children with Intellectual Disability: Comparing the CSBQ with ADI-R, ADOS, and Clinical DSM-IV-TR Classification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10803-009-0764-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annelies de Bildt, Erik J. Mulder, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Natasja D. J. van Lang, Ruud B. Minderaa, Catharina A. Hartman |
Abstract |
The Children's Social Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ) was compared with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), and clinical classification in children with mild and moderate intellectual disability (ID), to investigate its criterion related validity. The contribution of the CSBQ to a classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) was most specific for the subscales 'contact' and 'stereotyped', with high coherence with all three classification methods. The CSBQ may be used as a signaling, screening, or describing instrument for children with ASD and ID, as it complements other methods by adding unique information about the clinical presentation. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Professor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 56 | 47% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |