↓ Skip to main content

Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern?

Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern?
Published in
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), November 2010
DOI 10.1002/ccd.22670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivera Ciraj‐Bjelac, Madan M. Rehani, Kui Hian Sim, Houng Bang Liew, Eliseo Vano, Norman J. Kleiman

Abstract

To examine the prevalence of radiation-associated lens opacities among interventional cardiologists and nurses and correlate with occupational radiation exposure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 35%
Physics and Astronomy 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Engineering 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,988,480
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#206
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,208
of 191,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.