↓ Skip to main content

Validating Self-Nomination in Gang Research: Assessing Differences in Gang Embeddedness Across Non-, Current, and Former Gang Members

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Quantitative Criminology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Validating Self-Nomination in Gang Research: Assessing Differences in Gang Embeddedness Across Non-, Current, and Former Gang Members
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10940-014-9215-8
Authors

Scott H. Decker, David C. Pyrooz, Gary Sweeten, Richard K. Moule

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 34%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 44%
Psychology 7 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#705,694
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#25
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,465
of 225,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them