| Title |
Effects of kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, October 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00317436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward J. Heske, James H. Brown, Qinfeng Guo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,365,559
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,997
of 4,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,371
of 20,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.