| Title |
Emotion Regulation and the Anxiety Disorders: An Integrative Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10862-009-9161-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josh M. Cisler, Bunmi O. Olatunji, Matthew T. Feldner, John P. Forsyth |
| Abstract |
The construct of emotion regulation has been increasingly investigated in the last decade, and this work has important implications for advancing anxiety disorder theory. This paper reviews research demonstrating that: 1) emotion (i.e., fear and anxiety) and emotion regulation are distinct, non-redundant, constructs that can be differentiated at the conceptual, behavioral, and neural levels of analysis; 2) emotion regulation can augment or diminish fear, depending on the emotion regulation strategy employed; and 3) measures of emotion regulation explain incremental variance in anxiety disorder symptoms above and beyond the variance explained by measures of emotional reactivity. The authors propose a model by which emotion regulation may function in the etiology of anxiety disorders. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 740 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 146 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 125 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 105 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 72 | 9% |
| Researcher | 67 | 9% |
| Other | 97 | 13% |
| Unknown | 154 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 437 | 57% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 6% |
| Unknown | 198 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,032,548
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#13
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,334
of 87,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.