↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Differences in Pictorial Reasoning Between High-Functioning Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive Differences in Pictorial Reasoning Between High-Functioning Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0712-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chérif P. Sahyoun, Isabelle Soulières, John W. Belliveau, Laurent Mottron, Maria Mody

Abstract

We investigated linguistic and visuospatial processing during pictorial reasoning in high-functioning autism (HFA), Asperger's syndrome (ASP), and age and IQ-matched typically developing participants (CTRL), using three conditions designed to differentially engage linguistic mediation or visuospatial processing (visuospatial, V; semantic, S; visuospatial + semantic, V + S). The three groups did not differ in accuracy, but showed different response time profiles. ASP and CTRL participants were fastest on V + S, amenable to both linguistic and nonlinguistic mediation, whereas HFA participants were equally fast on V and V + S, where visuospatial strategies were available, and slowest on S. HFA participants appeared to favor visuospatial over linguistic mediation. The results support the use of linguistic versus visuospatial tasks for characterizing subtypes on the autism spectrum.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2009.
All research outputs
#6,239,764
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,292
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,595
of 95,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.