↓ Skip to main content

Electroencephalographic coherence, aging, and memory: distinct responses to background context and stimulus repetition in younger, older, and older declined groups

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electroencephalographic coherence, aging, and memory: distinct responses to background context and stimulus repetition in younger, older, and older declined groups
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2726-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hogan, Peter Collins, Michael Keane, Liam Kilmartin, Jochen Kaiser, Joanne Kenney, Robert Lai, Neil Upton

Abstract

The current study examines the EEG coherence of young, old, and old declined adults performing a visual paired-associates task. In order to examine the effects of encoding context and stimulus repetition, target pairs were presented on either detailed or white backgrounds and were repeatedly presented during both early and late phases of encoding. Younger adults were found to have lower levels of frontal-temporal and temporal-parietal coherence, but higher levels of frontal-parietal coherence, particularly for the gamma frequency band. A number of differential coherence responses to background context and early- versus late-encoding phases were also observed across the groups, particularly for lower alpha and upper alpha frequencies. Coherence-performance maps were generated to further explore topographical differences in the relationship between coherence and performance across groups. Results revealed a more diffuse pattern of negative coherence-performance relations in older declined adults. Results are discussed in light of the literature on age-related cognitive decline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 32%
Neuroscience 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Engineering 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,338,946
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,473
of 3,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,078
of 111,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.