↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Correlates of Maternal Antibody Status Among Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Behavioral Correlates of Maternal Antibody Status Among Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1378-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Braunschweig, Paul Duncanson, Robert Boyce, Robin Hansen, Paul Ashwood, Isaac N. Pessah, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Judy Van de Water

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) affect approximately 1 in 110 children in the United States. This report profiles fetal-brain reactive autoantibodies of a large cohort of mothers of children with autism and controls, yielding significant associations between the presence of IgG reactivity to fetal brain proteins at 37 and 73 kDa and a childhood diagnosis of full autism (p = 0.0005), which also correlated with lower expressive language scores (p = 0.005). Additionally, we report on reactivity to proteins at 39 and 73 kDa, which correlated with the broader diagnosis of ASD (p = 0.0007) and increased irritability on the Aberrant Behavioral Checklist (p = 0.05). This study provides evidence of multiple patterns of reactivity to fetal brain proteins by maternal antibodies associated with ASD and specific childhood behavioral outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Psychology 22 17%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,148,806
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,338
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,267
of 144,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.