↓ Skip to main content

TCR hypervariable regions expressed by T cells that respond to effective tumor vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
TCR hypervariable regions expressed by T cells that respond to effective tumor vaccines
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00262-012-1217-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly R. Jordan, Jonathan D. Buhrman, Jonathan Sprague, Brandon L. Moore, Dexiang Gao, John W. Kappler, Jill E. Slansky

Abstract

A major goal of immunotherapy for cancer is the activation of T cell responses against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). One important strategy for improving antitumor immunity is vaccination with peptide variants of TAAs. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the expansion of T cells that respond to the native tumor antigen is an important step in developing effective peptide-variant vaccines. Using an immunogenic mouse colon cancer model, we compare the binding properties and the TCR genes expressed by T cells elicited by peptide variants that elicit variable antitumor immunity directly ex vivo. The steady-state affinity of the natural tumor antigen for the T cells responding to effective peptide vaccines was higher relative to ineffective peptides, consistent with their improved function. Ex vivo analysis showed that T cells responding to the effective peptides expressed a CDR3β motif, which was also shared by T cells responding to the natural antigen and not those responding to the less effective peptide vaccines. Importantly, these data demonstrate that peptide vaccines can expand T cells that naturally respond to tumor antigens, resulting in more effective antitumor immunity. Future immunotherapies may require similar stringent analysis of the responding T cells to select optimal peptides as vaccine candidates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,653,793
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#823
of 2,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,318
of 156,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.