↓ Skip to main content

C-Reactive Protein and Other Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in Women

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
47 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4881 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1244 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
C-Reactive Protein and Other Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in Women
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2000
DOI 10.1056/nejm200003233421202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Ridker, Charles H. Hennekens, Julie E. Buring, Nader Rifai

Abstract

Since inflammation is believed to have a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events, measurement of markers of inflammation has been proposed as a method to improve the prediction of the risk of these events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Other 14 1%
Unknown 1193 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 212 17%
Researcher 162 13%
Student > Master 151 12%
Student > Bachelor 125 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 82 7%
Other 277 22%
Unknown 235 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 416 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 4%
Psychology 35 3%
Other 221 18%
Unknown 293 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#548,992
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6,966
of 32,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260
of 40,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#9
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.