↓ Skip to main content

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised: Independent Validation in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
597 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
Title
The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised: Independent Validation in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0213-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen S. L. Lam, Michael G. Aman

Abstract

A key feature of autism is restricted repetitive behavior (RRB). Despite the significance of RRBs, little is known about their phenomenology, assessment, and treatment. The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) is a recently-developed questionnaire that captures the breadth of RRB in autism. To validate the RBS-R in an independent sample, we conducted a survey within the South Carolina Autism Society. A total of 320 caregivers (32%) responded. Factor analysis produced a five-factor solution that was clinically meaningful and statistically sound. The factors were labeled "Ritualistic/Sameness Behavior," "Stereotypic Behavior," "Self-injurious Behavior," "Compulsive Behavior," and "Restricted Interests." Measures of internal consistency were high for this solution, and interrater reliability data suggested that the RBS-R performs well in outpatient settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 450 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 16%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 93 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 160 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 12%
Neuroscience 38 8%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 124 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,227,664
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#479
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,968
of 69,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.