↓ Skip to main content

Normal Rates of Neuroradiological Findings in Children with High Functioning Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Normal Rates of Neuroradiological Findings in Children with High Functioning Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1407-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roma A. Vasa, Marin Ranta, Thierry A. G. M. Huisman, Pedro S. Pinto, Rachael M. Tillman, Stewart H. Mostofsky

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to analyze highly specific volumetric and morphological features of the brains of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To date, there are few comprehensive studies examining the prevalence of neuroradiologic findings seen on routine MRI scans in children with ASD. This study examined the prevalence of neuroradiologic findings in children with high functioning ASD, and compared these rates to those in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and children who are typically developing (TD). Results showed that approximately 90% of children had normal MRI scans. There was no significant effect of diagnosis on the total number of neuroradiological findings or the number of specific brain findings. Implications and future research directions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Professor 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 65 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 71 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,588,310
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,786
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,852
of 246,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#16
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.