↓ Skip to main content

A Latent Class Analysis of Seroadaptation Among Gay and Bisexual Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
A Latent Class Analysis of Seroadaptation Among Gay and Bisexual Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0879-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiffer G. Card, Nathan J. Lachowsky, Zishan Cui, Allison Carter, Heather Armstrong, Susan Shurgold, David Moore, Robert S. Hogg, Eric A. Roth

Abstract

Initial research into seroadaptive strategies suggests that, individually, they are potentially effective behavioral methods to reduce risk of HIV transmission. Combining strategies, therefore, has the potential to increase risk reduction. The aim of this study was to determine how gay and bisexual men (GBM) combine strategies. To this end, a total of 774 sexually active GBM, aged ≥16 years, in Metro Vancouver, Canada, were recruited. Grouped by self-reported HIV status, latent class analysis of self-reported condom use, strategic positioning, anal sex avoidance, serosorting, viral-load sorting, and withdrawal were conducted. Multinomial logistical regression identified explanatory variables of class membership (i.e., sensation seeking, treatment optimism, sexual altruism, relationship status, number of partners, anal sex preference). Four latent classes were identified: Condom Users, Multiple Prevention Users, Viral-Load Sorters, and Serosorters. The majority of HIV-negative/unknown men (72 %) and a large proportion of HIV-positive men (42 %) belonged to the Condom Users class. Class membership was associated with age, relationship status, treatment optimism, sexual altruism, sensation seeking, number of recent male anal sex partners, and recent condomless anal sex with a serodiscordant or unknown-status partner. Understanding these distinct patterns allows for tailored interventions addressing GBM's sexual health needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Psychology 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,493,111
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3,208
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,927
of 420,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#43
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.